Author Archives: admin

Details about online poker games

In a 10-20 game the other night, I had A-9 on the button. A loose player had already called in seat number two, everyone else folded.  What is the right play here?

Answer 1:

Raise or muck. I favor raise, but not if both blinds will always call. It is always wrong to just call with this hand in this situation. BTW, I also would raise if the caller was a tight player so long as he didn’t have a propensity to limp with AA and KK.

 

Answer 2:

If you consider the players in the blinds to be somewhat tight, and you think they may throw away their hands, then raising is a good option. If the blinds are more on the loose side and likely to defend their blinds, you’re not giving up much by just throwing your A-9 away. I don’t consider calling to be much of an option here.

Answer 3:

I would raise because of the button. If the SB and BB fold then this is a fair heads up hand. If the flop is not friendly and the 2nd seat bets you can fold with your position. Even if the SB & BB call the raise you still have position on the loose player in the second seat. If the flop is right you can dominate. If it is wrong… You fold and lose 2 Small Bets. I like A-9 on the button with loose passive players that might fold against a semi-bluff bet after three checks, and the button bets the flop. I either am looking for the flop to hit my hand, or it does not hit anybody and I try for a semi-bluff. If the players are calling stations, I do not like the hand as much depending on the flop. Typically any bets by the button are called by the calling stations and this puts more money in the pot. In the end this makes loose calls pay in pot odds. Here are some questions to ask yourself. Does the SB realize that for 1 1/2 Small Bets he will have a positional disadvantage the rest of the hand. Does the SB adjust accordingly? If so I like the A-9 even less and I muck the card. If not, and the SB will cold call with Q-X suited, then I like the A-9 off-suit for a raise and play it aggressively.. Until somebody looks like they have identified the possible semi-bluff…

 


How to win golden casino games?

The game is 3-5 Texas hold’em w/ a 3 & 5 dollar blind and a straight 5$ bet at all times w/ up to 5 raises. I raise middle position w/ AQo and get heads up w/ the button.
Flop:  29T rainbow
I bet, she calls
Turn:  J
I bet, she calls
River:  5
I check, she checks and her AK beats my AQ Should I have bet on the river? Should I have bet on the river if I thought she would muck her hand at least 1 in 8 times? Should I have bet on the river even though I’m beaten by any legitimate pre-flop calling hand?

 

Answer 1:

I think you should have bet on the river, it was your only chance to win
outright without showdown. I don’t see too many people call all the way with just AK thru three bets no pair. A check on the end doesn’t help you.

Answer 2:

If your local game is like mine, no one will let you get the pot for free-
they will always call, so by checking you saved yourself one big bet. So I guess the answer depends on how well you know your game or your opponent. In tighter games betting on the river will win you the pot. (Or else you run into a check raise!!!)

Answer 3:

The real key in this hand is that would you be getting better than 8-1 odds on what must be considered a pure bluff. At these low limit games people call raises and call bets all the way to the river with the worst pair. In this case A-2 would be a hand that people might, and do call with. It is not about pots but about money. If you think she would have called anyway you risked less money.


Casino affiliate programs and its advantages

Could some of you stud players define for me “over-aggressive” playing. Some concrete examples would be helpful.

Answer 1:

Automatically raising with the high board card in situations where that raise is highly unlikely to steal and you have total blanks in the hole.

Answer 2:

Automatically raising in early position with lo pair in the hole and a lo
kicker.

Answer 3:

I would describe an over-aggressive player to be one who bets/raises without a specific goal in mind. An aggressive player will bet/raise for a reason. The over-aggressive player will bet/raise for no apparent reason or for the wrong reason.


Basic steps to play casino games

Does anyone know what game they were playing in _Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels_ when the guys lost the $500K?  It looked like some kind of three-card closed form stud, but I don’t believe every player had to have the same stake in the pot. When the big crime boss bet $250K, our hero had to come up with $500K to “call” (and they were heads up.)

 

Answer 1:

I think that was an old-style game called Brag, which is an ancestor of poker, but I’d never seen the like of it, and am perfectly willing to stand correction on it.

Answer 2:

I don’t know what game it was, but I believe you are mistaken about the stakes. If I’m not mistaken, the crime boss bet 250K and the young guy either had to have someone else loan him the money, since he was out, or he lost. The crime boss stepped up and said that he would loan him the money, since no one else would, but informed the kid that he would need 500K to see the hand to the end, indicating that he was going to keep raising, possibly one more bet in the amount of 250K, although I’m not sure how he could raise if the young kid only called.  But like I said, I don’t know what game they were playing, so I could be completely wrong. This is just the impression that I got from the movie.

Answer 3:

The game was Three Card Brag, still fairly popular in home games inBritain. Hand rankings go (I believe) Nothing, One Pair, flush, straight, 3 of a kind, str8 flush. Not too sure about the ordering of the last two, but I do remember that a straight ranked higher than a flush for some reason.


Question on Tax Laws and Gambling

I’m pretty ignorant to the tax laws, but I’m curious: Is money made in online poker (offshore) taxable?

Answer 1:

While I can’t guarantee I’m right, I’m pretty sure that any income made overseas by a U.S. resident is subject to U.S. Federal Income tax.  If you pay taxes to the foreign country, you might get an offset to that amount, but I doubt you’re paying any Costa Rican taxes at the Planet or Paradise Poker sites.


Answer 2:

It is defiantly taxable, but the US Gov’t has no idea that you earned the income – so they put the responsibility on you to report it in “other taxable income not reported” – this is were they get you for tax evasion (But don’t worry – that only holds true if it is over 10% of your AGI “adjustable gross income”)

Answer 3:

The short answer:  Yes.  If you are residing in the US, it doesn’t really matter where you earn the money.  It’s taxable. If you are a US citizen who lives abroard (or is physically present in the foreign country for a substantial part of the tax year), then foreign income is excludable.


Riverboat Poker

So it seems that Riverboat Poker on the Iowa/Illinois poker in the Quad Cities is nearing its end. I have been corresponding with several friends who are still employed in the poker rooms on both the Isle of Capri (formerly Lady Luck) in Bettendorf, and The President in Davenport.  For quite a while the rumors that IOC was closing the room have been unsubstantiated.( read : HOPE beyond hope they dont…) I just got back from my former stomping grounds and heard first hand from several VERY reliable sources, the “facts”.
Expect the closing shortly (30-90 days).  The slot machines are coming.  Sad. Any hope that the action would continue at the Prez if IOC closed its room have also been dashed.  The Old president is due for mandatory dry-dock soon, when the smaller replacement boat is brought in, there will be no poker room. Additionally, it is rumored that IOC has made a bid to purchase the Prez, some say it is a done deal. So what are the odds that IOC reopens a room on the Prez?

Answer 1:

I started playing casino poker about a year ago and visited the Lady Luck and President 2-3 times a week.  There was a game every night, and tournaments were decent.  However, over the last 4 months the rooms have really slowed down.  I started playing at Meskawki about 3 months ago and love it.  No bad beat rake, very well run tournaments, solid dealers.  Plus they spread 4-8 every night instead of the 3-6 and 2-4 crap in Davenport. You should give Meskawki an honest try…they have a great pot limit holdem game on Friday nights and a 4-10 half kill Omaha game that goes most nights. On a side note, I did return to the President on Sunday for one last night before I venture out to Seattle next week and walked down to find one table of 1-4 Stud at 6 p.m.  I think that’s a definite sign that Poker is about history in Davenport.

Answer 2:

I wasn’t knocking Mesquaki at all.  I’ve played there numerous times.  I started dealing Poker on the President, about 8 years ago or so.  You should have seen the action then…13 games going almost 24/7, with lists as long as your arm, for a year, then it started to slowly dwindle to what remains.  It hasn’t been “good” for a long time. Limited player base, excessive drop/jackpot, and Chicago action are the culprits in the demise of the action in the QC’s.  I moved on and went to Harveys in Council Bluffs to help open the room there. It lasted about 18 months before things started to go downhill, and I moved here to Arizona.  The keys to the success of poker here in Phoenix/Scottsdale is the HUGE player base, and the fact that POKER is i major part of the Casino Operation (2nd behind slots, which are limited, of course).  BUT, there is no internal competition between other, more profitable, table games here…No house banked games…hence no Blackjack, Craps, or Roulette.  The fact that poker was so
much less profitable than those house banked games is why poker took a distant
5th out 5 in terms of importance to the house in the Midwest. Poker was doomed
from the start. Best of luck to you and Mesquaki.  I think that room is going to be better than it is, with the increase in players that it will surely soon see.

Answer 3:

Nope, grew up in Des Moines….and I agree about the player base…you would think that with the growing popularity of poker that those two rooms would be able to survive but oh well.  I didn’t mean to imply that you were knocking Mesquaki.. Was just suggesting to others an alternative when the Riverboats shut down their rooms…


Ban Internet Gambling?

‘m surprised that not more has been said about the proposed legislation to ban all internet gambling.  From what I’ve read, there are more than enough votes for this bill, but there is a disagreement about whether horse racing should also be included.  The dispute about horse racing is the only thing right now preventing this legislation from being passed. The internet gambling ban will force ISPs (internet service providers) to restrict our ability to access gambling sites. My question is will this kill all internet gambling– whether it be sports books or poker sites–or are there
ways around such restrictions?







 
Answer 1:

Assuming you refer to S.692 aka HR3125 (the Kyl Bill, aka The Internet Gaming Prohibition Act of 2000), this is not as devastating to thee industry, though this is the one in more immediate danger of becoming a law.   This act applies only to the online casinos, and has no penalties or restrictions against the act of gambling online itself — it merely restricts the right to operate a gambling business online. Of more dire consequences if passed is HR4419, aka “The Internet Gaming Funding Prohibition Act”, introduced May 10th.  This bill applies to the gamblers themselves, somewhat indirectly.  It makes it illegal to use a credit card, OR a check, OR any legal tender, to buy cyber-chips at an online casino!   S.692 has passed the Senate, and could be voted on in the House this week.  Tell your Congressman to vote no. HR4419 has been referred to committee (Banking and Finance), and is not scheduled for any House vote soon.  If your Congressman is on the Banking and Finance committee, tell them to oppose HR4419.

Answer 2:

You are reading out of date reports.  As I understand it, the Kyl bill makes it illegal for a US citizen to operate an online wagering site. What I don’t understand is why would this be needed? Haven’t they already prosecuted Americans for operating offshore sports betting facilities?

Answer 3:

Yes, and then they lost at federal appeals.  Some Dallas bookies were convicted of operating a gambling website out of the Bahamas. Monies were not collected in the US; they were sent to Canada for deposit in a bank there and drawn on by the Bahama book (much as Planet Poker works).  The Fed Circuit Court said that the deposit of money was not a bet, they overturned the convictions.


“Winner’s Guide to Texas Hold’em Poker” by Ken Warren

I picked up suject book used mainly because it was in it’s third printing.  Does Ken Warren understand low stakes Hold’em?

Answers:

He might but he doesn’t understand how to calculate odds very well… Although many of his thoughts are ok.. He makes many errors in his calculations of how much a hand is favored over another. And, Caro made mistakes in his odds calculations in Super System.  So what? Yes, he does understand low-limit poker.  A couple of the sections aren’t well written and might be misleading, but overall it’s a good book.  It’s the only book on the market that specifically targets the most common spread limit structure 1-4-8-8 with 1/2 blinds. The odds mistakes aren’t really important.

I’m beginning to understand and utilize many of the important aspects needed for a strong game.  I still have not found the best place to learn to calculate odds.  Someone posted something a day or two ago that was helpful.  It explained how you use odds to decide if your hand merits a call.  More information like that and how to calculate odds is what I’m looking for. This was the first poker book I ever purchased. It produced a remarkable improvement in my game. I’ve gone on to read several others that have added to my arsenal of knowledge. If Warren’s book is the first book you’ve studied than it should produce similar results.
The fact that you purchased a poker book and want to improve your game by studying is what produces advances in your play. BTW, I’m been reading Carson’s digital book and I’m finding parts to be very interesting and enlightening.


What is Straddling?

There’s a website article somewhere I read about whether or not it is a good idea to “straddle” but I have no idea what that is.  Could someone help me here?





Answers:

Straddling is like posting a voluntary blind twice the size of the big blind.  In a 4-8 game, the small blind is $2, the BB is $4, and a straddler might put up a straddle of $8.  In essence, it’s like raising the blind before looking at your cards. Some (most?) rooms rule that a straddle is live, meaning that the straddler has the option to raise when the action comes back to him (just like how the blinds have the option to raise).

Straddling is something i encourage, but don’t do.  =)  I MIGHT do it if I knew it would loosen the game up (it often does if you get a couple guys in a row to follow).  Two nights ago a guy straddled two rounds in a row and got AA BOTH TIMES.


Poker Short Handed Question

I’ve been playing in some short handed games lately at Canterbury-mainly because i usually get there around last call and play late.  Some questions:

1.  What are some ways i can maximize my potential against fish?  I understand that pairs go way up in value with less and that draws are much worse.  I also know to play aggressively, but by how much?  With 4-5 players, should I raise preflop with A-big card?  Pocket pairs?  I’m just not sure how much I should lower my standards.  Axo playable?

2.  How do I defend against a good player?  I know I “should” switch tables but I want to get better at poker and that involves playing against good opponents.  I already consider myself a big enough player at the table, but I ran into a guy the other day who BLEW ME AWAY.




Answers:
First of all, define short-handed.Second of all, it seems to me that there are two different strategies against fish- one advocates sitting tight and playing tight, and the other is, well, a bit more vague.  It sort of seems to advocate jumping in there, but being an expert.  Go figure.  I’ve been up against this question for a few weeks.

As mentioned, there are two schools of thought.  (Pardon the pun). You can play like a rock.  Classically tight-aggressive, predictable and mathematical.  Someone who has read S&M cover to cover.  You can add considerable

flair to this basic strategy, but ultimately a rock will never be the best player in the cardroom.

The other style is what I would call ‘fastplay’.  I personally have switched from a computer-like rock to a fastplayer in the past six months, and I can’t recommend it highly enough.  What’s critically important for fastplay is that you learn tells and how to read people.  You must be highly, highly aggressive.  I could describe fastplay a number of ways, but essentially it’s like this:

From the moment your opponent picks up his cards to about the time the turn card hits, you are attempting to work out what cards he has, and more importantly, how he’s going to play those cards.  It’s a lot easier to do this when you’re the one doing the betting and he’s the one doing the calling.  Personally, I wear a cap and prescription sunglasses, and stare at their faces throughout the entire hand (thought they wouldn’t realise it).  So that what HE has is more important than what YOU have.  If you know he has a made hand AND will call to the river, you